MANGERIAN FOUNDATIONS OF THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND THE AUSTRIAN BUSINESS CYCLE THEORY: LINKAGE AND CONTROVERSIES

Authors

  • András Toth

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v18i1.707

Abstract

The Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT), based on the insights of Böhm-Bawerk and Mises, became one of the core theoretical insights of the Austrian School of Economics.The 2008 crisis seemed to support the ABCT. Nonetheless, the relatively small harm caused by the crisis and the longest economic expansion ever seen refuted warnings about hyperinflation and civilizational collapse. The aim of this paper is to explain the cause of the relative success of the credit expansion monetary system through the reconstruction of the original Mengerian theoretical framework combined with the Misesian insights.First, the paper reconstructs Carl Menger’s main tenets of thought. The paper discusses how the post-Mengerien development diverged into two conflicting concepts concerning the role of credit: the one conceptualized by Schumpeter and the one conceptualized by Mises. The paper shows how Schumpeter distorted the original Mengerian thought in order to explain business cycles, while Mises, under the influence of Böhm-Bawerk, discarded some of Menger’s key assumptions making ABCT less reflective of the impacts of the entrepreneurial boom allowed by credit expansion. In the discussion, I argue that the reformation of ABCT based on the combination of the original Mengerian framework and the Misesian insights explains both the resilience and success of the credit based monetary system, but also warns that the real danger is the rise of an omnipotent government based on credit expansion that can pave the road to serfdom.

Keywords: Austrian Business Cycle Theory, Austrian School of Economics.

JEL Classification: A10, B13, B53, D50, E14, E32, E58, P16xí.

References

Ahiakpor, James (2003). Classical Macroeconomics. London and New York, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413524

Andersen, E. S. (2009) Schumpeter’s Evolutionary Economics. London and New York: Anthem Press.

Arena R. and Gloria-Palermo S. (2001), ‘Evolutionary themes in the Austrian tradition: Menger, Wieser and Schumpeter on institu- tions and rationality’, in Garrouste P. and Ioannides S. (eds), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bagehot, Walter (1885), The Postulates of English Political Economy, New York and London: Putname’ Sons

Block, Wagner (2019), “I’m An ‘Austrian’ Economist: What Does It Mean?” https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/03/walter-e- block/im-an-austrian-economist-what-does-it-mean/

Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1930). The Positive Theory of Capital. New York,

G.E. Stechert and Co [1930].

— (1890) Capital and Interest, a critical history of economical theory.

London, New York: Macmillan and Co.

— (1898). Karl Marx and the Close of His System: A Criticism. London, T.Fisher Unwin.

Braun, Eduard (2013), “Carl Menger’s Contribution to Capital Theory”, TUC Working Papers in Economics, No. 11.

Eichengreen, Barry and Flandreau, Marc (1985), The Gold Standard in Theory and History. London: Routledge.

Fekete, Antal (2007), “The Paradox of Interest revisited.” https://pro- fessorfekete.com/articles/AEFTheParadoxOfInterestRevisited.pdf Festre ,́ Agnes (2002), “Money, banking and dynamics: the Wickse- llian Routes from Mises to Hayek and Schumpeter.” Am J Econ

Sociol 61:439–480

Haberler, Gottfried (1951), “Joseph Alois Schumpeter 1883-1950”, in: Harris. S.E (ed). Schumpeter: Social Scientist, Harvard Univer- sity Press, Cambridge DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884555

Hayek, Friedrich (1931), “A Note on the Development of the Doc- trine of ‘ Forced Saving,’” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. xlvii, pp. 123-133.

— (1980), Prices and Production and Other Works. Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

— (1944), The Road to Serfdom with The Intellectuals and Socialism.

London, The Institute of Economic Affairs [2005].

— (1968), “Economic Thought: The Austrian school”. in. Sills D.E. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences V.4. New York Mac- MIllan, 458-462.

— (1976), Introduction to Carl Menger Principles of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 11-37.

— (1992), “Carl Menger (1840-1921).” In The Fortunes of Liberalism: Essays on Austrian Economics and the Ideal of Freedom. Vol. 4. The Collected Works of F . A . Hayek. Peter G. Klein, ed. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.

Huerta de Soto, Jesús (1998), Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, Mises Institute: Alabama [4th ed. 2020].

Hülsman, Guido (2007), Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Kirzner Israel (1990), “Commentary”. In: Hennings K, Samuels WJ (eds) Neoclassical economic theory 1870 to 1930. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, pp 242–249

McCaffrey, M. (2013), “Conflicting use of Entrepreneur in Turn-of- the-Century Vienna”. History of Economic Review (58): 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18386318.2013.11682207

Menger, Carl (1871), Principles of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute [1976].

— (1888). “Zur Theorie des Kapitals”. Jahrbücher für Nationalökono- mie und Statistik, 17, 1-49

— (1892), On the Origins of Money. Auburn, Ludwig von Mises ins- titute [2009].

— (1994), Carl Menger’s Lectures to Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria. Streissler, Erich and Streissler, Monika (eds). Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Mill, John S. (1965), Collected Works. Edited by J.M.Robson. London: University of Toronto Press [1967].

Mises, Ludwig (1912), The Theory of Money and Credit. New Heaven, Yale University Press [1953].

— (1944), Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

— (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, Scholar’s Edition, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute [1998].

— (1981), Epistemological Problems of Economics, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute [3rd ed. 2003].

— (2009), Memoirs. Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, Margit (1976), My Years with Ludwig von Mises. New Roche- lle, N.Y.: Arlington House.

Raico, Raico (2012), Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School.

Auburn (Alabama): Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Rothbard, Murray (1963), America’s Great Depression, Mises Institute. Salerno, Joseph T. (1999a), “Carl Menger: The Founding of the Aus- trian School.” 15 Great Austrian Economists. Holcombe, Randall

G. (ed.). Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute.: 71-100.

— (1999b), “The place of Mises’s Human Action in the develop- ment of modern economic thought.” Q J Austrian Econ 2:35–65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-999-1025-8

— (2008), “Böhm-Bawerk’s Vision of the Capitalist Economic Pro- cess: Intellectual Influences and Conceptual Foundations.” New Perspectives on Political Economy 4(2): 87–112.

Smith, Adam (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Strand, Strahan and Cadell, Reprint: Univer- sity of Oxford, Eighteenth Century Collections Online

Schumpeter, Joseph (1917), “Das Sozial Produkt und die Rechenp- fennige: Glossen und Beitrage zur Geldtheorie von Heute.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft XLIV: 627–715. Translated into English by A. Marget. “Money and the social product.” Interna- tional Economic Papers 6: 148–211 [1956].

— (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, New Jersey, Transaction Publishers [2004].

— (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.

— (1943), ‘Capitalism in the postwar world’, in S.E. Harris (ed.) Pos- twar Economic Problems, New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

— (1943), Capitalism, Democracy and Socialism, London: Routledge [2003]

— (1954), History of Economic Analyses, London: Routledge [1981]. Streissler Erich (1983), “Schumpeter and Hayek: On some similari-

ties in their thought”, in. Machlup-Fels-Muller-Groeling (eds.)

Reflections of a Troubled World Economy, London Macmillan.

— (1987), ‘Wieser F. von’, in J. Eatwell M. Milate and P. Newman (eds), The New Palgrave: A dictionary of Economics (vol. 4), Lon- don: Macmillan.

Yagi, Kiichiro (1993), “Menger’s Grundsitze in the Making.” His- tory of Political Economy 25 (Winter). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-25-4-697

Yonay, Yuval (1998), The struggle over the soul of economics: institutio- nalist and neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Prin- ceton, Princeton University DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822522

Wicksell, K. (1898), Interest and Prices. New York: M. Kelley Publi- shers [1965].

— (1893), Value Rent and Capital. Reprinted by New York: Augustus

M. Kelley Publishers [1970]

— (1907), „The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices” Economic Journal XVII (1907), pp. 213-220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2220665

Wieser, Friedrich (1893), Natural Value. London: MacMillan.

— (1927), Social Economics, London: Allen & Unwin.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-02

How to Cite

Toth, A. (2021). MANGERIAN FOUNDATIONS OF THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND THE AUSTRIAN BUSINESS CYCLE THEORY: LINKAGE AND CONTROVERSIES. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 18(1), 124–160. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v18i1.707

Issue

Section

Articles