The Courtiers of Confusion: A Reply to Wysocki and Block





Igor Wysocki and Walter Block have offered a critique of my subjective definition for probability. In this article, I offer a detailed exposition of Wysocki and Block’s mistaken critique. I focus on the logical incoherence of their argument, as well as the inconsistency of their argument with Ludwig von Mises’s own ideas about probability. I also describe how Wysocki and Block have built their argument on a mistaken view of what subjectivists believe as well as a mistaken view of what the brothers von Mises held. I thus argue that Wysocki and Block have failed to redeem Ludwig von Mises’s approach to


Crovelli, Mark R. (2009): “On the Possibility of Assigning Probabilities to Singular Cases, or: Probability is Subjective Too!” Libertarian Papers 1, 26.

— (2009): “Has David Howden Vindicated Richard von Mises’s

Definition of Probability?”, Libertarian Papers 1, 44.

— (2010): “A Challenge to Ludwig von Mises’s Theory of Probability,” Libertarian Papers 2, 23.

— (2011): “Can Probability Be Subjective and Objective at the Same

Time? A Reply to Arnold Baise,” Libertarian Papers 3, 28.

— (2012): “All Probabilistic Methods Assume a Subjective Definition of Probability.” Libertarian Papers. 4(1): 163-174.

Good, I.J. (1983): Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its

Applications. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2007): “The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and the Frequency

Interpretation,” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics Vol.

, No. 1 (Spring): 3-21.

Mises, Richard von (1981) [1957]: Probability, Statistics and Truth. 2nd

Revised ed. New York.

— (1985): Theory and History. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises


— (1996) [1949]: Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 4th rev. ed.

Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education.

Wysocki, Igor & Walter Block (2020): “Crovelli on Probability: A

Critique.” Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía

Política Vol. XVII, n.º 2, Otoño. pp. 245 a 272



2023-02-20 — Updated on 2023-02-20


How to Cite

R. CROVELLI, M. (2023). The Courtiers of Confusion: A Reply to Wysocki and Block. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 19(2).